The vast majority of back pain is functional- meaning the pain is because the back is not functioning correctly. Unfourtunately, some is chronic pain which can be managed by this cbd oil vape pen starter kit. Accordingly, it makes since that back pain treatment strategies should focus on discovering and addressing the movement-related back pain from it not functioning properly. Unfortunately, many people with back pain are over diagnosed with a structural problem (such as scoliosis, spine degeneration), are given pain medications that fail to address function, and are instructed to concede activity. It is certainly prudent to address symptoms and temporarily modify activity during an episode of back pain, but this is no replacement for treatment that rehabilitates low back function.
Research into the Best Treatment for Low Back Pain
The Annals of Internal Medicine published a study investigating massage therapy compared to medical care for chronic back Pain. Low back pain can affect up to 80% of the population. When a doctor treats low back pain, the main goal is to decrease the pain and help the individual return to their usual activities. Those with low back pain may be confused by the different treatments that are offered by different medical specialist. Doctors of chiropractic, medical doctors, physical therapist, and massage therapists have different tools to address back pain. In the past, I have had friends that have suffered greatly from back pains and they all went down different routes to get them fixed. You could tell the effectiveness of the treatments as one was cured quickly by a physiotherapist in Dublin while another took months and months to get better after going for bad massage therapy.
Usual Medical Care for Back Pain
The medical researchers in this study compared “usual medical treatment” to massage therapy for back pain lasting for more than three months in 401 individuals. For purposes of the study, they defined usual medical care as pain killers, anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, back exercises, and education about ways to deal with the current back pain and prevent future back pain.
First, the researchers measured the participants’ symptoms and the effect of their back pain upon their daily activities. The participants were randomly assigned to the “massage group” or the “usual medical treatment group”. Those in the massage group received a one-hour massage once a week for 10 weeks. The effects were measured after 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. If someone is suffering from lower back pain it would be helpful to check out http://www.ckphysio.co.uk/index.php/treatments/physiotherapy/ealing/ , as it would be a good way to find out information on how to get help.
Massage vs. Medical Care for Back Pain
The researchers discovered that those with low back pain who received massage therapy had less pain and were better able to perform daily activities than those treated with “usual medical care.” Both pain and performance were still improved for those receiving massage at six months and at 12 months. After 12 months, those in the usual medical care group were doing just as well as those who had received massage therapy.
In summary, those receiving massage for chronic low back pain enjoyed more rapid improvement in their pain and daily function than those receiving “usual medical care”. It is important to acknowledge that there is no cookie-cutter approach for a health professional applying treatment to a back pain. Each chronic back pain syndrome is unique, and should be thoroughly evaluated before treatments are recommended.
Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Kahn J, Wellman R, Cook AJ, Johnson E, Erro J, Delaney K, Deyo RA. A comparison of the effects of 2 types of massage and usual care on chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):1-9.
What about Pain Medication for Back Pain?
A lot of people are confused about what to do when confronted with an episode of low back pain. Unfortunately, that confusion also extends into the healthcare system, such that some patients don’t get effective, evidence-based back pain treatment.
As scientists find the most effective treatments for spine problems, other researchers aggregate that information to form clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute mechanical low back pain are based upon sound scientific evidence rather than on consensus.
The recommended guidelines for evidence based back pain treatment:
- Avoid narcotic pain medication
- Avoid passive treatments (such as bed rest, heat, or back braces)
- Pursue an aerobic exercise program
- Use of a short course of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Tylenol, Advil) unless medically contraindicated
- Use lumbar spine manipulation therapy (chiropractic manipulation)
- Receive education and reassurance about low back pain
So a study in 2010 published in The Spine Journal analyzed the treatment of 92 patients with new onset low back pain. Half of the patients were treated via “usual care” at a major hospital system and failed to receive treatment consistent with evidence-based guidelines. (see table below)
The other half of the patient group received evidence-based treatment including exercise, anti-inflammatory medication (NSAIDs), reassurance, and manipulation. Compared to the “usual care” group, those receiving the evidence-based treatment including chiropractic spinal manipulation therapy had significantly greater improvement in low back function 8, 16, and 24 weeks later. This is more evidence to show that chiropractic care can be very successful in the treatment of back pain, despite how wary some people may be towards it. When experiencing back pain, it’s shown that visiting a chiropractor such as Chiropractor Prahran often delivers positive results.
Commenting on the study, the journal editors wrote, “This study offers some insight into high rates of opioid in passive methods for acute low back pain employed in “usual care” at a university-based hospital. The results of avoiding some well-documented treatment pitfalls and using the evidence-based guideline method appear promising. The study also provides evidence that the actual implementation of guideline recommendations may be truly beneficial to patients, themselves, and not just to payers’ strategy to minimize costs.”